Wednesday, 18 September 2013

Asianized and Hollywoodized


The idea of Hollywood becoming Asianized is quite importance in the world of globalisation in 

which companies and industries that had been primarily nationalise such as Hollywood being 

produced in America for Americans, whereas now Hollywood will use actors, directors and 

martial arts choreographers. It is not just the idea of Hollywood hiring people from other 

regions just because of the talent; it’s also the potential audience of the regions that they want, 

for example using a actors such as Chinese’s Jet Li. Not only would Hollywood aim at the 

western world with actors such as Jet Li but also the potentially massive market of China, 

whose population is around one billion, 1/7th of the world population.



But it not just a one way street Asian films are becoming more Hollywoodized, areas of Asia 

that once had been dominated by Hollywood now have local films that can rival Hollywood 

movies. Hong Kong boast 50% of box office were that of local films in 2001. Movies have 

becoming more transnational as globalisation continues to grow and shape many different 

industries including the film industries for example movies such as Kill Bill which is set in Japan 

and America but is filmed in china give a brief view into the working of globalisation. Another 

example is Pacific Rim, filmed in Canada, directed by a Mexican, with Japanese’s, British and 

American actors shows the try potential of a Asianized Hollywood and globalisation.    



Klein, Christina 2004, ‘Martial arts and globalisation of US and Asian film industries’, Comparative America Studies, vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 360-384   

4 comments:

  1. Hi Steven!

    Your first sentence does not make much sense to me:
    ’The idea of Hollywood becoming Asianized is quite importance (important?) in the world of globalisation in which companies and industries that had been primarily nationalise (nationalised?) such as Hollywood being produced in America for Americans, whereas now Hollywood will use actors, directors and martial arts choreographers (I think they do use these already?)’.
    This is generally continuing through your blog post, I suggest you read it through and correct your grammar before publishing. You also include a biography in the end, but you do not refer to it through the text.
    I am sorry Steven, but you confused me more than I enjoyed reading your post. Good luck with it!

    Silja

    ReplyDelete
  2. Hey Steven,

    I like that you have reviewed this topic in a way which makes it very easy for the reader to understand. Although some of the explanations were brief, your use of examples were effective in relaying your thoughts on how Hollywood is becoming more and more asianised. I would have liked to have heard more about how/if these transitions have influenced your choices towards the movies you watch.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hey Steven,

    I like that you have reviewed this topic in a way which makes it very easy for the reader to understand. Although some of the explanations were brief, your use of examples were effective in relaying your thoughts on how Hollywood is becoming more and more asianised. I would have liked to have heard more about how/if these transitions have influenced your choices towards the movies you watch.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hey there! I thought you explained the topic nicely and it was easy to see the point you were trying to make, but I felt that you could have gone into more detail. Your post was a little bit short so I think you definitely had some more room to go into detail about ‘Hollywoodisation’ and ‘Asianisation’. Your inclusion of the weekly reading was good and so were your film examples. I felt that some of your sentences were a little bit wordy and could have maybe been broken in two. I also would have liked to have seen some images but overall well done.

    ReplyDelete